Friday, May 30, 2008

Secretary Defence, CDS & Army Commander Tour East

SECRETARY DEFENCE Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) Air Marshal Donald Perera and Commander of the Army Lieutenant General Sarath Fonseka, in an apparent move to take stock of new security developments in the east, particularly in the aftermath of the recent Provincial Council elections, flew to Ampara, Konduwattuwan Combat Training School and met a representative gathering of Security Forces serving the east.

The visiting trio was welcomed by Major General J.J.P.S.T. Liyanage, Commander, Security Forces East before those present sat for a discussion. Those visiting defence authorities, as the first leg of their interaction spoke to Army Area Commanders, General Officers Commanding, Brigade Commanders and Sector Commanders and exchanged views with them related to the security status quo in the area.

Afterwards, the high-level defence team addressed Special Task Force (STF) personnel, Police Officers and Police Constables and listened to their views and hardships. The visiting defence authorities took steps then and there to resolve certain matters which were related to their execution of Police duties in the area.

As the second leg of their tour, all three authorities flew to Welikanda area where they were received by Brigadier Dampath Fernando. The visiting defence authorities as in Ampara chatted with senior military commanders and Army officers in the area and issued instructions that should be complied with in the performance of their security duties. Later on they had a lengthy discussion with STF personnel and Police Officers serving the area. During those discussions, Commander of the Army Lieutenant General Sarath Fonseka pointed out the importance of offering maximum possible support for the elected representatives in the restoration of law and order.


Thursday, May 29, 2008

Vehicle parks on city outskirts to ease congestion, save fuel

The Government has taken steps to set up three large vehicle parks at entry points into Colombo city in Peliyagoda, Nugegoda, and Katubedda from where commuters can enter the city using a luxury vehicle service.

This measure is expected to curb the large waste of fuel in vehicles due to congestion in the Colombo city and to ease traffic jams, especially during the rush hours.

This new transportation system will be enforced from August this year.

According to statistical figures released by the University of Moratuwa as results of a survey, 8, 33,000 commuters enter Colombo daily of whom 83,000 use trains as the mean of transportation. In addition 1,75,000 private vehicles enter the city daily.

The National Transportation Commission believes that the implementation of this new system will save Rs. 40 billion spent on fuel annually.

Courtesy: Government Information Department

Vesak Observed at the University of Oxford

The Sri Lankan Society at the University of Oxford officially observed the Vesak Full Moon Poya day on Monday the 19th of May. . A Buddhist Sermon was organised under the patronage of the Ven. Bogoda Seelawimala, Chief Incumbent of the London Buddhist Vihara.

The Patron of the Society is H.E. the President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Ven. Seelawimala Thera, delivering a Sermon at the University, emphasized on the significance of Wesak. The discourse also included an introduction to Buddhism and the basics of Buddhism. The sermon was well received and was followed by a Q & A session, which the audience participated enthusiastically. Many moral and spiritual dilemmas were discussed at length.

It was held amidst a large gathering, comprising of both Sri Lankans and foreign guests: including Thai, Indian and Chinese delegations. A free distribution of VCD’s containing Dharma Talks by Ven. Dr. K. Sri Dhammananda (courtesy of the Mrs. H.M. Gunasekera Trust) followed the Sermon. There was also the presentation of “pirikara” and the tying of “pirith nool.”

The Sri Lanka Society was founded in November 2007 by Arosha Gunasekera (current President) and Dilan Fernando (Secretary). Since its inception the society have achieved many “firsts”, including celebrating the Independence Day for the first time. Thus a forum to promote Sri Lanka was established.

Press Release - Sri Lanka Society, University of Oxford

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Kudos to US Ambassador; Rotten Tomatoes to Bruce Fein

I was happy to read that yesterday the US Ambassador to Sri Lanka, the Hon. Robert Blake, has asked the leader of the LTTE, Velupillai Prabhakaran, to give up his demand for a separate Tamil state. He said he thinks that “95% of them (Tamils) support a solution within the framework of a united Sri Lanka.” Mr. Blake said giving up the idea of a separate state would give Prabhakaran "lots of credibility to respond to lots of skepticism here in the South (Sri Lanka) that the LTTE would never negotiate with the government." He also said, "I always remind people who are visiting from US that Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims lived together and continue to live peacefully together. Tamils are living in Colombo peacefully with their Sinhalese and Muslim friends. So there is no ethnic conflict here. And certainly the government is defending itself against terrorism.”

I would like to note for the record that the present mayor of Colombo is a Muslim, and the Deputy Mayor is a Tamil. There are also several members of the President’s cabinet who are Tamil (now, of course, there are two less since Foreign Minister Kadiragamar and Highways Minister Fernandopulle were brutally assassinated by the LTTE – one by a sniper, the other by a suicide bomber). The newly-elected Chief Minister of the Eastern Province, recently liberated from the LTTE, is also a Tamil. How’s that for proving the Ambassador right?

I completely agree with Mr. Blake’s assessment of the conflict in Sri Lanka, and I applaud him for speaking with such practical, good sense about a tragic, messy situation that simply needs to end – ASAP.

I met Mr. Blake during a trip to Sri Lanka last year. I paid a call on him at his office in the Embassy, and I found him to be a kind and knowledgeable gentleman. At the time I felt proud that we Americans had such a committed, compassionate individual representing our country in the most important posting in troubled Sri Lanka. We have exchanged e-mails a time or two since my return to California. I was just about to send him another one – congratulating him on his statement – when I saw the retort written yesterday by Attorney Bruce Fein, the paid mercenary Washington lobbyist employed by Tamils for Justice (please read “Front Organization for the Banned LTTE Terrorists”).

How can this Bruce Fein, a Beltway prostitute who accepts blood money from the LTTE ($100,000 per month retainer, I’m told), get a good night’s sleep doing and saying what he does? I not only found his remarks to be glib and arrogant to the extreme (using stuck-up phrases for the Ambassador’s remarks, like “owlish certainty which earmarks the glitterati” and “his opulent ambassadorial milieu” – puleeeze…!), but his suggestion that the Ambassador hold a referendum to prove his 95% figure is not only silly, but irresponsible.

Dangerous, duplicitous, greedy Mr. Bruce Fein (no, I don’t like him) thinks Sri Lanka should hold a referendum to determine whether or not the Tamils want their own independent state. Does he think the 100,000 Tamils still living up in the LTTE-occupied north (last census in 1984 said there were 600,000 registered, but an estimated 500,000 have either gone south or emigrated to other countries – an embarrassment for Prabhakaran, who wouldn’t want a counted vote anyway) warrant an independent state – carved out of a small island country? The Tamil population accounts for 12% of the total, so that means there are 2,300,000 Tamils living in the South (not counting the 100,000 up north). Does he think all these people are all going to leave their homes and businesses behind (they have been living peacefully in Colombo and elsewhere for centuries) and simply move up to Eelam, the new motherland, Prabhakaran’s Paradise on the Peninsula?

Get real, Bruce Fein; what do you know? You’ve never even been to Sri Lanka – all of your information is second or third-hand! Nobody’s going to move up north and give up everything they have just to live in some fantasy Tamil-land. The referendum’s results in favor of a unified Sri Lanka would not only embarrass your clients, the LTTE and its Parasite Prabhakaran, but it would be downright patronizing of the intelligent, highly-cultured Tamil citizens of the island who are “Sri Lankan” first.

Thank you, Ambassador Blake, for your distinguished service to two countries.

Stephen Long
Los Angeles, California

Monday, May 26, 2008

Bomb rocks busy Sri Lankan train in Dehiwala

The injured were rushed to local hospitals for treatment At least eight people have been killed and 67 injured in a bombing during rush hour on a packed Sri Lankan commuter train, the military says.

The blast hit the Colombo-Panadura train in Dehiwala station, in a suburb of the capital Colombo, Brigadier Udaya Nanayakkara said.

He blamed Tamil Tiger separatists for the attack, the latest in a string targeting public transport.

The military says it defused two bombs found on buses over the weekend.

Ten days ago a suicide bomber on a motorcycle rammed a bus carrying police officers and last month another explosion inside a bus killed more than 20 people.

In February, 11 people died in a suicide attack at Colombo's main train station.

Tamil Tiger separatists were blamed for that incident, although they routinely deny involvement in bombings in the country.

Toll 'could rise'

The army said Monday's explosion occurred at 1650 local time (1120 GMT), and the area had been cordoned off.

Bodies have been pulled from the wreckage and the defence ministry said the number of dead could rise.

Brigadier Nanayakkara told AFP news agency a pregnant woman was among the dead.

Commuter Ramani Padmalatha, 42, told AFP the train suddenly slowed after a "deafening noise".

"People were shouting 'bomb, bomb!' and scrambling to get out of the windows of the carriage... I managed to jump out from the door. People were stumbling out of that carriage with blood stains on their clothes, some with burns, some looking dazed," she said.

Eyewitness R A Upali told the BBC Sinhala service the explosion took place as the train was pulling out of the station.

"I ran to the place where the explosion happened. I saw people fall on the platform. People with minor injuries ran towards us."

The train compartment's windows were blown out and part of its roof was torn off in the blast, which left bloodstained bags and umbrellas strewn among the debris.

Battles are continuing in the north of Sri Lanka, where the military is carrying out an offensive aimed at crushing the rebels by the end of this year.

On Monday air force helicopters attacked Tiger positions a day after fighting on the ground killed 21 rebels and one soldier, according to the military.


Correspondents say that the number of attacks in the south has increased as the fighting has intensified in the north.

The Tigers have fought for a generation for an independent state for the Tamil minority in the island's north and east.

About 70,000 people have been killed since the civil war began in 1983.

Violence in the island nation intensified after the government formally pulled out of a ceasefire agreement in January.

Before the latest outbreak of hostilities, the Tamil Tigers had warned that not only the Tamils in the north, but the majority-Sinhalese in the south would also feel the impact of the war.

The warning has been followed up by roadside bombs, suicide blasts and explosions targeting public transport in the south, although civilians inside rebel-held territory in the north have also become victims of mines allegedly planted by the army.

Analysts say that if the violence continues, the government may be forced to redeploy some troops from the northern battlefront to the south to step up security.

BBC Video

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Politics not my cup of tea - US Ambassador

The United States reiterated its willingness to support President Mahinda Rajapaksa to achieve the desired task of the Commission of Inquiry appointed by the President to probe into the killings of 17 aid workers and other human rights violations.
In an interview with the Sunday Observer US Ambassador Robert Blake said the US has no intention in interfering with the Commission and the US strongly believed in the independence of the Commission.
Blake along with another diplomat was accused of holding a meeting with the commissioners said that the agenda of the meeting was only to discuss the ‘logistic matters’.
Q: Are you satisfied with the support that the US had offered so far to Sri Lanka and what are the strategic areas where the US and Sri Lanka should work closely?
A: Yes. The US and Sri Lanka are close friends for more than 50 years now. The US is a strong supporter of Sri Lanka’s fight against terrorism. We strongly believe that Sri Lanka like all other countries has an obligation to defend its people against LTTE terrorism.
The US has provided military, law enforcement and other kinds of support to help the government to defend itself while believing that a purely a military solution would not be the correct solution for this conflict.
The US believes that the answer to the conflict lies with a power sharing concept which can respond to the aspirations of Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims. We also believe that in this very important stage of the conflict, it is very important for the government to address the human rights issues as well.
The US also has concerns about Tamils who suffer disproportionately due to human rights violations. It is important to give them a sense of feeling that they could live with respect and dignity here. So improving the human rights performances is also an important aspect of our dialogue with the government.
Q: The US supports developing countries. Sri Lanka has been battered and bruised by LTTE terrorism and how best the US could support in curbing terrorism?
A: I think I have just answered that question. The US is one of the first countries to declare LTTE as a foreign terrorist organisation in 1997. We have also helped to investigate and prosecute people in the US, who were trying to provide arms to the LTTE.
So, the FBI, for an example, has conducted distinct operations that had resulted in the arrest of many people and those investigations are on-going. We also have a central bank, which improves financial investigations to track down the money flow into the LTTE and help to stop those money from flowing in.
Then the most importantly we work with our friends in the military to help them to stop import of arms into this country.
We gave them a maritime surveillance system last year - a radar system - that will give the Sri Lanka Navy a much better picture of LTTE naval activities in their waters and thereby give them the opportunity to detect LTTE shipments of arms. I must say they have enjoyed considerable success last year in sinking many of these ships.
The ban on LTTE is extremely effective in terms of implementing the American law. People understand that we are very strict about forcing our laws which will prosecute anyone who is believed to be illegally assisting the LTTE.
Q: Criticism had mounted when the East was about to be liberated. Now the Mahinda Rajapaksa government has created the right environment to give more power to the people whereby they can look after their own affairs. What is your comment on restoring democracy in the East?
A: I think President Rajapaksa and the Sri Lankan Government made very important progress over the past year. First they have expelled the LTTE from the East. That is a positive development and secondly they have restored government services.
In the East they have reopened schools, hospitals and government institutions. Now there is a greater sense of normalcy in many towns in the East. People are out late at nights, going for movies and for shopping which is a big achievement after 20 years. There is stability now, in that part of the country.
With regard to the election we always support the principle of free elections. It is important to allow the local inhabitants to represent their views. There have been some controversies which were highlighted in the media.
The Opposition parties have alleged that there were many irregularities. The US is not in a position to judge since we did not have observers on the ground. But we think that it is important for the government and the new Provincial Council to look into those charges seriously and act on them.
In the long run it is really important to consider what the people of the East believe. If they believe that it was largely a free and fair election and they support the new council, then the international community should also be prepared to accept their decision in toto.
In terms of what happens after, I think that the new Chief Minister has an important challenge on his hand. First of all, he has to assure security, because on one hand he is the chosen Chief Minister of the Eastern Province and on the other hand he is the head of the TMVP which still has armed cadres.
So, he is in a difficult position where he has to enforce state law as the Chief Minister and on the other hand a fairly large number of armed cadres. I think something must be done and they can not continue to do illegal activities in the East.
Otherwise they would undermine the leadership of Pillaiyan and the transition that the TMVP is trying to make while being a para-military group and a political party. So, we support the idea of them of being a political party. But that transition must be completed and certainly they can not be in both.
Beyond the challenge of security, I think that the new Chief Minister in order to secure the support of the people of the East, it is very important to show that he has been given opportunities to serve all other communities in the East and pursuing development in a neutral way.
And I think that way he can ensure that there is harmony among these communities and also stability in the East, which will automatically reach to a greater development and priority for the people of the East.
Q: Will the US continue with its support to develop the East?
A: Yes, we have quite a number of projects with the assistance of the private sector, for example the vocational training. We have just announced a major project in Batticaloa to develop dairy industry and another to grow vegetables for exports.
We strongly believe that we need to help the people of the East and give them economic opportunities. We believe that there is a big role for the private sector to play. We have proposed to give more assistance for the East and the US government is considering it now.
Q: You have always advocated a credible political package to meet the aspirations of the Tamils. How do you see the APRC proposal to implement the 13th Amendment?
A: The East is a fine laboratory to show that powers within the 13th Amendment be devolved within the Eastern Provincial Council. But I think the government needs to go beyond the 13th Amendment. Implementing the 13th amendment is itself will satisfy the aspirations of the Tamils.
The way they develop must be a significant power sharing proposals through the APRC using some other mechanisms. But I do believe that the APRC has made lots of progress.
According to Prof. Vitharana over 90 percent of their work has been done and I think the APRC has been a useful mechanism to get the Southern consensus to move forward. The most important thing is to come up with an idea which is really welcomed by the Tamils.
I think that it is important for the government to consult a wide range of Tamils. We are not calling for negotiations with the LTTE. That is something that the government has to decide.
It is important to recognize more than half of the Tamils are living outside the Wanni. I think their interests also should be respected as well. So, people like Anandasngaree and other elected representatives in the government controlled areas are needed to be brought into this process and consulted.
Q: You mentioned the solution should be something beyond the 13th Amendment. So what is your proposal to end the national issue?
A: I think we need to distinguish as these are two different things. The President Rajapaksa’s proposal to implement the 13th Amendment is a good idea. But I don’t really want to come up with a proposal because whenever I try to say something I am later accused of trying to dictate to the Sri Lankan people. The US does not have any intention of doing that. It is up to the Sri Lankan people to decide what is best for them.
Q: What do you think that Sri Lanka is facing today - is it a war on terror or an ethnic problem? What sort of a solution do you suggest to end the conflict in the island?
A: I think all these are loaded terms. I am reluctant to say this is an ethnic conflict but it is a civil conflict. I always remind people who are visiting from USA that Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims lived together and continue to live peacefully together. Tamils are living in Colombo peacefully with their Sinhalese and Muslim friends. So there is no ethnic conflict here. And certainly the government is defending itself against terrorism.
Q: It is clearly proven that the LTTE is not the sole representative of the Tamils. And also it has been proved the LTTE’s political agenda is different from the Tamils. What do you have to say?
A: I do actually see there are important differences here. From my discussions with Tamils I know that over 95 percent of them support a solution within a framework of a united Sri Lanka.
They are not seeking an independent Tamil Eelam which Prabhakaran is seeking. I think it would be very useful for Prabhakaran to give up this idea of seeking an independent Tamil State and agreeing to negotiate with a united Sri Lanka.
I think this would give him lots of credibility to respond to lots of scepticism here in the South that the LTTE would never negotiate with the government. The LTTE has a responsibility to show that they are prepared to negotiate in a genuine way.
Q: What is your view about the on-going military operations to liberate Wanni where people are living under severe hardship and the young and the old were being conscripted by the LTTE?
A: With respect to the on-going military campaign, as I said earlier, the US do not believe in purely a military solution is possible. The 25-years long experience of war here has shown that the LTTE is a rather formidable organisation and it is very difficult to defeat them militarily.
So the best way to reach a solution is through a political solution to address the aspirations of the Tamils and all the communities. And again the Tamils in Wanni and rest of the country need sense of dignity and conviction in future that they will be able to have an important say over matters that concern them especially the areas where they are predominant.
They should be able to have a high degree of self governance within a united Sri Lanka. I believe that is really a way forward to achieve a peaceful settlement to this conflict.
Q: You have just mentioned that the military can not defeat LTTE and this was the assumption before the East was liberated by the military. So how can you say that the military cannot defeat the LTTE in North?
A: The East was a different situation and the LTTE was spread out. But Wanni is more in the heartland of the LTTE. Here they have been prepared for many years to face any kind of an attack.
Q: Do you still believe that Sri Lankan Security Forces cannot capture Prabhakaran?
A: I think you have to ask this question from the Forces. What I can say is that the US does not have any love for Prabhakaran. But it is going to be difficult for the government to get him.
Q: He is the ‘Most wanted man’ by the Indian government for the killing of the late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. In which way could the US help the government to bring him to book?
A: I can not really say how, as we are not involved in any military efforts to capture him. We believe that the best way would be, not with the gun but through peaceful means.
Q: Do you think that both Al-Qaeda and the LTTE, are ruthless terrorist organizations and how do you categorise the LTTE?
A: I would not say they are the same at all. I do not want to get into the business of comparing terrorist organisations because every terrorist organization is different. And it is also important to address the LTTE in the Sri Lankan context.
Q: But some countries call the LTTE as freedom fighters?
A: I do not respect the freedom fighter argument. Certainly any group which is working for freedom, they should do it in a peaceful manner. They can not use violence and terror. That is same with the LTTE and we have consistently said they must renounce terrorism and stop using violence.
Q: The US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a common fight - combatting terrorism. But some critics say that the US has double standards when combatting terrorism against the US and dealing with the terrorism in countries like Sri Lanka. What is your comment?
A: I really don’t agree with that. I think we have a very consistent approach and even in places like Iraq where we are confronted with a very serious terrorist problem and we are in favour of a political solution there. The insurgency strategy of the US is based on using a wide range of tools to combat terrorism and it is just not the military strategy.
In Iraq we are engaged in with certain strategies to bring down the levels of killing and violence both against American forces and other coalition forces. The ordinary iraqis have come way down over the last years. Iraq is a major domestic issue an year ago in my country and now people have confidence that Iraqis are in a better track and hopeful about their future.
So the policies are the same that we are advocating here in Sri Lanka and so I can say there would not be any double standards.
Q: In this situation what are the priorities of a country - combatting terror to save lives or safeguarding human rights?
A: Well. I do not think there is contradiction between the two. I think one has to devote. Clearly one has to defend one’s country against terrorism. That is extremely important. For any government the most important priority is to defend its citizens. It is true in the US and it is true in Sri Lanka and every other country in the world. But we also believe that it is possible to preserve human rights.
So, for example, one of the very difficult problems the government faces is to identify suicide bombers. How they find these people before they carry out their murderous acts. And I believe that the way to do that is still to arrest, question in a humane way and if they are suspected of the crime produce them in courts.
But do not use extra judicial killings and other kind of things. And those acts will undermine the long term solutions. So, it is much better to use rule of law to address terrorism. Accountability of rule of law is extremely important.
Q: Do you think that Sri Lanka has violated UN Conventions when strengthening bi-lateral relations with Iran?
A: I do not think so and not to my knowledge. But is up to the government to be aware of those resolutions.
Q: Iran is in rivalry with the US with regard to nuclear issues. Therefore how do you see the recent visit of the Iranian President to Sri Lanka?
A: Our concerns about Iran is well-known. President - Bush, Secretary of State - Rice and many our leaders are concerned about their nuclear capabilities. We acknowledge their right to develop civil nuclear energy for energy purposes. But the US opposes nuclear weapons. Similarly we have expressed our deep concern about the Iranian support for international terrorism particulary in the Middle East, especially the support for groups like Hisbulla.
We always want all our friends to make the same point for Iran. At the same time we understand that Sri Lanka has to develop relationships with Iran and we do not have objections if they donate funds education projects in the South.
Q: We were made to understand that you had met the members of the Commission of Inquiry which probes into 15 cases of killings of Aid workers and other alleged HR cases? What was your area of interest while meeting the commissioners?
A: Yes, we did have a short meeting with them, and the purpose of the meeting as Justice Udalagama has explained was purely a technical matter. The Commission did not get the support of the IIEGPS and the Commission has the problem of how to continue the video conferencing to record testimony of witnesses resident abroad. So the question arose as to whether the international community could continue to fund the video conferencing.
Since the US and the other partners in the IIEGP process happened to fund the process all along, we discussed the matter whether to fund the particular video conferencing. So that was real the purpose of the meeting.
The US do not have any intension of whatsoever in interfering anyway with the Commission of Inquiry. We strongly believe in independence. I really do not share the allegations that we are interfering with the Commission and we simply looked into logistic matters.
We support the Commission appointed by the President. And he has reiterated on many occasions that his commitment in seeing this commission achieve its desired task. So we totally support the President in this regard.
Who is Robert Orris Blake, Jr.
When little Kalina listened to fairy tales, he never did imagine that he would have a ‘future’ as a story teller. He read out stories everyday. Then again, he was ‘compelled to continue with the habit with his second daughter Zara and now one and a half years old Alexi is there and whenever dad appears at the doorstep, receiving him, with the command “reeeeead” holding her favourite story book.
Ambassadors are said to be those lie abroad for the sake of their countries and also rub shoulders with kings and queens and have little time or no time for the masses but the US Ambassador Robert O. Blake is a diplomat who is ready to devote his tight schedule for reading stories for children.
The Harvard educated US Ambassador, who has a M. A. in International Relations from the John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, is a ‘Master’ story teller. “My three daughters aged six, five and one and a half have inspired me and my wife Sofia to read stories. We love reading stories for children”, Blake said.
Some of the book sellers at the ‘Book fair’, who were aware the reading skills of the Ambassador couple invited them to read stories for children at the fair. Responding to the invitation Ambassador Blake with his two daughters enjoyed the session that day. “I agreed to read stories which I do everyday. I strongly believe that encouraging children to read and be excited about books is a very important aspect of the educational process”, he said.
Despite his responsibilities as the Ambassador of the US, he is ready to sit down with children at any given time to read out a story. “If any thing is there to do with reading with children I will be there”, he said.
Being the 23rd US Ambassador of Sri Lanka, he was earlier the US representative in Tunisia, Algeria, Nigeria and Egypt and was the Deputy Chief of Mission in New Delhi, India before his posting to Sri Lanka. “I’m having a very delightful time in Sri Lanka.
I have been impressed by the warmth and hospitality of Sri Lankans, we have travelled widely around the country”, he added saying they were very much impressed by the diversity, mountains, beaches and cultural sites like Dambulla.
“It is a tremendous country with wonderful people”. That was the view of the Ambassador Blake who said that he can spend weeks at a stretch in Dambulla listening to the chirping of birds and then walking around ancient sites.
Dambulla being his favourite in Sri Lanka, the Dambulla cave Temple, Sigiriya and Kandalama are the other places that he likes to be in.
Blake, Jr. is a typical family man but never boasts that he is a son of a US career diplomat.
To this seasoned career diplomat, who said that politics was not his cup of tea, said that the most challenging task in his job, being the Ambassador of Sri Lanka, trying to encourage people to pursue a peaceful solution to the national problem.
Blake, who received minor injuries from a mortar bomb blast while on a helicopter visit to Batticaloa, to attend a development meeting along with Italian Ambassador Pio Mariano and the German Ambassador in February 2007, said that, “If Sri Lanka can progress in achieving peace before I leave, I will be one of the happiest”.
* United States of America is a strong supporter of Sri Lanka’s fight against terrorism.
* A power sharing concept is the answer to the conflict.
* The ban on LTTE is extremely effective.
* Those who are assisting in providing arms and money from the US were prosecuted and the FBI is conducting further investigations.
* The US will prosecute anyone who is believed to be illegally assisting the LTTE in the US law.
* Liberating East is a major achievement after 20 years.
* If the people of the East believe that the elections were free and fair the international community should be prepared to support the New Eastern Provincial Council.
* The new Chief Minister has a challenge - maintaining the security as the Chief Minister and also disarming the TMVP cadres as the head of the TMVP.
* The East is a fine laboratory to show the devolution of power under the 13th Amendment.
* Over 95 percent of Tamils want a solution within a united country.
* The LTTE is not the sole representative of the Tamils nor their freedom fighters.
* The US does not have double standards in dealing with terrorism on its own soil and here in Sri Lanka.

Sunday Observer

Prabhakaran must give up demand for separate Tamil state: US

Colombo (PTI): The US has asked LTTE supremo Velupillai Prabhakaran to give up demand for a separate Tamil state saying the community wanted a solution to the over two-decade-old ethnic conflict within a "united" Sri Lanka.

"...I think it would be very useful for Prabhakaran to give up this idea of seeking an independent Tamil state and agreeing to negotiate with a united Sri Lanka," US ambassador to Sri Lanka Robert Blake said.

Blake said from his discussions with Tamil people in Sri Lanka, he thinks "95 per cent of them support a solution within a framework of a united Sri Lanka.

"They (the Tamil people) are not seeking an independent Tamil Eelam which Prabhakaran is seeking," Blake told the Sunday Observer Newspaper.

Blake said giving up the idea of a separate state, would give Prabhakaran "lots of credibility to respond to lots of skepticism here in the South (Sri Lanka) that the LTTE would never negotiate with the government."

The US envoy said Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims have been living together in a peaceful manner in the country.

"I always remind people who are visiting from US that Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims lived together and continue to live peacefully together.

"Tamils are living in Colombo peacefully with their Sinhalese and Muslim friends. So there is no ethnic conflict here. And certainly the government is defending itself against terrorism," he said.

In reply to another question, Blake said US believes that the answer to the conflict lies with a power sharing concept which can respond to the aspirations of Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims.